Pandemics unlike diseases like cholera or malaria are not local and are not isolated to instances where an area suffers from poor hygiene. Pandemics are global. Anybody, anywhere can catch a disease that has reached true pandemic status. A disease like swine flu does not discriminate, rich or poor, young or old anyone can become a victim of its symptoms. Millions, even billions of people could potentially be infected with the disease. The potential devastation of a major pandemic is phenomenal. The 1918 Spanish flu pandemic infected one third of the world’s population and killed more than 50 million people. In the last century, pandemics killed more people than all the worlds natural disasters put together. The scales of death caused by pandemics were comparable to those of world wars.
The more skeptical among us will be quick to remind us that there is a major difference between diseases like malaria and cholera compared to a disease like swine flu.
Swine flu is a true pandemic, it can kill anyone… especially those in the industrialized world. As mentioned before diseases like malaria and cholera are localized to poorer regions of the world. The media could have focused on swine flu more intensely for the simple reason that it had the ability to affect the industrialized nations immensely. Disrupting the proper workings of governments and possibly crippling economies globally.
But does this make the media bad?
In view of the potential of pandemics the media had no option but to cover the swine flu situation the way they did. The more informed we are, the more prepared we are and we can’t be too informed when it comes to something as potentially dangerous as a new form of influenza.
For more information go to:
http://www.swine-flu-facts.info
http://www.swine-flu-facts.org
Our Ashes on the Wind – an explanation
1 week ago