If I remember correctly wasn’t the number of deaths due to swine flu in Mexico something close to 150 people? No, in fact on the 29th of April 2009 a number of media agencies stated that the official death toll was in fact 159. From the BBC to CNN it seemed that the numbers that were succumbing to swine flu were growing rapidly.
Now the number of deaths is less than half that amount, what happened? Is there something going on the background that we should be privy to?
This strikes of a swine flu cover up.
For more information look at:
http://www.swine-flu-facts.org/
Our Ashes on the Wind – an explanation
1 week ago
Of course the media have their own reasons for reporting the swine flu epidemic the way they did. There was a time swine flu was though to be REALLY dangerous, a threat to the western world. As soon as they realized it wasn't so dangerous they cooled down the level of coverage. There's a lot of self interest mixed in with media reports nowadays.
ReplyDeleteTrue media have covered the whole swine flu saga in a strange way. Blanket cover of swine flu when it first broke and then nothing... for weeks.
ReplyDelete